the gray children

Discuss the original 2006 movie.

Moderator: Moderators

User avatar
the man in the planet
SHH Cult Subscriber
SHH Cult Subscriber
Posts: 867
Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Location: here
Contact:

Post by the man in the planet »

Lord Stan Deluxe wrote:I think there will be two diffrent Grey Children. "Normal" (if that word fits them) ones and then burned ones when Rose reaches the final area of the movie (Nowhere??).
i think that scene where Rose has the lighter and sees them is a rip from the beginning of the game, where Harry is trapped in the alley before he wakes up and finds cybil.
[img]http://www.rubbersquare.com/flipsig.jpg[/img]
StinkBomber
Gravedigger
Posts: 537
Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Location: Somewhere?
Contact:

Post by StinkBomber »

Some movies have so much CGI, I wonder why they didn't just animate it from scratch.

Silent Hill is obviously something that would lose much in an animated form, but certain films and movies, especially of the science fiction variety, seem like they'd just be better off. Then again, I'm a big fan of Ghost in the Shell and other anime series/movies whose only difference from box-office hits is thier visual style.

Come to think of it, Keanu Reeves is starring in a strange looking film called "A Scanner Darkly" whose visual style IS completely cel-shaded and oddly enough that really sets the film off with the way reality shifts around him with the movie's Drug themes.

Yeah. I'm a sucker for animation. If you asked me to translate a medium to film, I'd go with animation simply because that character IS that character, not just an actor wearing thier clothes.
Last edited by StinkBomber on 20 Apr 2006, edited 1 time in total.
www.stinkbomber.deviantart.com
User avatar
the man in the planet
SHH Cult Subscriber
SHH Cult Subscriber
Posts: 867
Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Location: here
Contact:

Post by the man in the planet »

a scanner darkly hurts my eyes in the preview. like watching it drunk. makes me nauseated, actually, it might just be keanu's "acting."
[img]http://www.rubbersquare.com/flipsig.jpg[/img]
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

Yeah, I never knew the name for them given by others, so I just called them "Little Baby Zombie B*st*rds with Knives!" :-P
User avatar
Latraxus
Just Passing Through
Posts: 133
Joined: 21 Apr 2006
Location: Boston

Post by Latraxus »

after re-looking the previews for SH, i think there are 2 different versions of the grey children.. cuz the tv spots with her getting dragged, if you looked at any of the stills from that, it doesn't look at all like she has her overcoat jacket on, and it looks more like a school setting.
User avatar
The Silent Executioner
Cafe5to2 Waitress
Posts: 220
Joined: 30 Mar 2006

Post by The Silent Executioner »

Things like the multitudes of roaches are...probly not much else was cgi. They did add digital darkness though....I really want to see how that turns out.
ant_garland
Gravedigger
Posts: 477
Joined: 27 Mar 2006

Post by ant_garland »

the fog is CGI probably because the couldnt find a town drenched in fog
User has been Trolled. And rightfully so.
User avatar
F8TAL
Cafe5to2 Waitress
Posts: 251
Joined: 06 Sep 2004
Location: NYC07
Contact:

Post by F8TAL »

Archaeis wrote:There is really no CGI in the movie?
Gans said there's some CGI for Pyramid Head and some of the monsters. Not heavy CGI, but they used CGI for the monster's makeup effects and what not.
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v64/blank_terminus/F8TALsig.jpg[/img]
User avatar
amphreded
Historical Society Historian
Posts: 3898
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Gender: Male

Post by amphreded »

There are CGI for sure: the intense fog, the cockcroaches, the alternate world. But not heavy on monsters I assume.
[size=84][b]QUICKLINKS | [/size][size=75][url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2362]SH1[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2313]SH2[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2327]SH3[/url] | [url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=43347#43347]SH4[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=17936]SH:H[/url] | [url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=391270#391270]SH:O[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=85043#85043]SHMovie[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=12563]SHGeneral[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/faq.php]FAQs[/url][/size][/b]
[size=84][color=grey][i]

[/size][/color][/i]
User avatar
the man in the planet
SHH Cult Subscriber
SHH Cult Subscriber
Posts: 867
Joined: 16 Sep 2003
Location: here
Contact:

Post by the man in the planet »

well...
PRIME_BBCODE_SPOILER_SHOW PRIME_BBCODE_SPOILER:
it was obviously pre-cgi as it is all one scene and all the children are burned and smouldering - very awesome sequence, btw
[img]http://www.rubbersquare.com/flipsig.jpg[/img]
kingscratchie
Just Passing Through
Posts: 30
Joined: 29 Mar 2006
Location: San Antonio
Contact:

Post by kingscratchie »

A lot of the interactions with the monsters (grey child, PH, Janitor, Nurses) were with actors, which made a hell of a difference IMO
I needed you to punish me, I don't need you anymore
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

The movie is full of CGI (bugs, rust, etc...).

The creature effects are mostly done by people in suits, but sometimes they're touched up with CGI. For instance, the children that people are talking about in this post have some highlight areas on their sides that are smoldering like hot coals.

The CGI is there, but it isn't overwhelming like other monster flicks. It does its job by enhancing what is already on screen.
pwn3d91
Just Passing Through
Posts: 67
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Contact:

Post by pwn3d91 »

Well now we know, it's both! (is that a spoiler O_o)
FACT:Jesus indeed does NOT love the little children.
User avatar
amphreded
Historical Society Historian
Posts: 3898
Joined: 20 Jul 2005
Gender: Male

Post by amphreded »

pwn3d91 wrote:Well now we know, it's both! (is that a spoiler O_o)
That's fine as long as you don't overly describe how they look or talk about their role/context, etc.
[size=84][b]QUICKLINKS | [/size][size=75][url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2362]SH1[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2313]SH2[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=2327]SH3[/url] | [url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=43347#43347]SH4[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=17936]SH:H[/url] | [url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=391270#391270]SH:O[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?p=85043#85043]SHMovie[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=12563]SHGeneral[/url] |[url=http://silenthillforum.com/faq.php]FAQs[/url][/size][/b]
[size=84][color=grey][i]

[/size][/color][/i]
ravern
Gravedigger
Posts: 521
Joined: 07 Aug 2005

Post by ravern »

don't forget that the cgi as also used on the lying figure to distort it abit. but were not on about that so lol
pwn3d91
Just Passing Through
Posts: 67
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Contact:

Post by pwn3d91 »

ravern wrote:don't forget that the cgi as also used on the lying figure to distort it abit. but were not on about that so lol
lol, hey BTW (I'm sorry to go off topic) but how did you make those Gifs? From the trailer?


(How does it count an edit as a new post >_<)
FACT:Jesus indeed does NOT love the little children.
Key2darkness
Just Passing Through
Posts: 10
Joined: 25 Apr 2006

Re: the gray children

Post by Key2darkness »

the man in the planet wrote:i hope this hasn't been posted before. i really, really looked (lord knows i've been reposting other people's finds a lot lately :oops:

i noticed there's a big difference in how the gray children looked in the very first actual trailer and how they've looked in the recent spots. in the first one they looked like they were burning or smouldering where now they just look grey and blobby. much more apparent in motion.

Image

Image

Image

like they haven't added the effects to the other shots (or maybe they aren't the same creature?) or maybe in different part of the film? looks like the environment is different, but i'd guess (from the game) it's the opening part in the alley. unless they attack her again in the school?
i agree... in the comm... the second pic and the 3rd pic were in it... but no in the movie... how... and y... did they change them??? i think they looked much scarier b4... they dont look as scary now
Theres only one way out of life and thats... death
pwn3d91
Just Passing Through
Posts: 67
Joined: 22 Apr 2006
Contact:

Post by pwn3d91 »

Well if you look at those two pictures, they look completely different but when you watch teh movie they are one in the same.
FACT:Jesus indeed does NOT love the little children.
Smokey
Gravedigger
Posts: 552
Joined: 05 Jul 2004
Location: Orlando, Florida

Post by Smokey »

DeathByDesign wrote:No CGI...thats what I like the most..they look awesome...and they are actual people which scares me more...
Stop spreading this around. First of all it's completely obvious that EVERY creature was CGI enhanced, and of course the roaches were completely CGI - there was a ton of CGI in this film. What he said was, and this is still a good thing - that they had people act it out first. It's like you use motion capture for CGI only instead of that technology you get people in costumes to act it out - but unfortunately CGI has to be used to make it look better. Look at the gray children scene and I dare you to tell me that is not mostly computer animation. It's just obvious.


EDIT: I just scrolled up and realized I wasn't the first to say this so I appologize. But it doesn't hurt to clarify lol
If you can read this, I'll kill you.
Anonymous

Post by Anonymous »

I apologize for my comment about no CGI. I watched the movie on Friday, and for the first half, my mind was stuck on how amazing the non-CGI monsters were. Then I realized how retarded I am for believing that rumor.
Post Reply